Stogdill, 1948, mann, 1959, lord, devader, and alliger, 1986, kirkpatrick and locke, 1991, and. Stogdill wrote a paper in 1948 personal factors associated with leadership. In the mid20th century, the trait approach was challenged by research that questioned the universality of leadership traits. Trait theorists are primarily interested in the measurement of traits, which can be defined as habitual patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion. Leaders who are considered successful have a set of innate characteristics or qualities which have been developed by various 20oth century researchers. Steven gans, md is boardcertified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at massachusetts general hospital. Trait theories of leadership identify the specific personality traits that distinguish leaders from. However, research methods changed and as a result, stogdill came.
Traits and skills theories as the nexus between leadership and expertise. The evolution of leadership theory although the practice of leadership has changed considerably over time, the need for leaders and leadership has not bass, 1990a. Bass the free press new york london toronto sydney singapore. Traits and skills theories as the nexus between leadership. Explain what stogdills work was and how it was different from his predecessors. Ralph stogdill was one of the first to challenge traditional traitbased by a work he conducted in 1948. Stogdill, 1948 prompted scholars to look beyond leader traits and. Stogdill s 1948 survey of 25 years of research, in which he concluded, a person does not become a leader by virtue of the possession of some combination of traits. The distinction is, perhaps, theoretical hair splitting, but stogdill criticizes that trait theories.
Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer ratings of personality. Leadership is a kind of scarce resources and a determinable factor in an organization. Stogdill scrutinized findings from over a hundred leadershiprelated studies and initiated 27 groups of factors traits to be possessed by an effective leader. In his first survey, stogdill analyzed and synthesized more than 124 trait studies conducted between 1904 and 1947. This marked the end of researchers tenacious ideas that individual differences characterized leadership, or that theyd be able to predict leadership effectiveness. Stogdills later work builds on his conclusions from the literature search, and he presents an interesting analysis of the trait theorists. This followed much research during the previous two decades that had suggested the same. Manual dsm of the american psychiatric association. The trait theory of leadership focuses on identifying different personality traits and. Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and. Leadership, great man theories, trait theories and environmental. Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaireform xii.
Trait theory bingham 1927 stogdill 1948 1974 mann 1959 traitbased leadership theories comprise two major schools the great man theories of leadership, that great leaders are neither born nor made, but have certain trait whether inherited or developed that preconditions them to be effective leadership it is controversial. Surveys of early trait research by stogdill 1948 and mann 1959 reported that many studies identified personality. Many current trait theorists suggest that a consensus is emerging around the big five as the basic structure of personality. As a result, leadership research shifted away from traits the internal factor and towards behaviours the external expression of leadership. Mann, 1959, many researchers discarded traitbased leadership.
Contents preface to the third edition xi parti introduction to concepts. Scribd is the worlds largest social reading and publishing site. Chapter 1 provides a definition of leadership and brief discussions of differences between leadership and power, coercion, and management. Kendra cherry, ms, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. Traditional leadership theories traits research stogdill.
Leadership is a focal area of research in the 21st century, as illustrated by fulmer and conger 2004 who claimed that there are well over 15,000 published articles and books available on. Stogdill, 1948 which emphasize leadership or popularity to the exclusion of other aspects of performance covered here have been useful. This third edition reflects the growth and changes in the study of leadership since the 1981 edition. The trait approach to leadership is based on characteristics of individuals some successful and some unsuccessful. Important research into leadership traits, and among the first to challenge traditional traitbased theory, was the work conducted by ralph stogdill stogdill wrote a paper in 1948 personal factors associated with leadership. Analysis of trait, behaviour, and contingency theories md mahabubur rahman term paper business economics business management, corporate governance publish your bachelors or masters thesis, dissertation, term paper or essay. Leadership has a long and controversial classic history so as of trait theories. From this thinking emerged the formalization of trait theory of stogdill in 1974 with his handbook of leadership. No claim is made to completeness, but no sources of known relevance have been deliberately overlooked. Similar to the great man theory, trait theory suggests that the characteristics or the personality of a person may make them an effective leader.
However, in 1948, a researcher called stogdill noticed that people who were leaders in one situation were not necessarily leaders in other situations, which rather destroyed trait theory, and situational and behavioural theories started to emerge. Stogdill, 1948 focused on the relationship between. They reasoned that if leaders possess superior qualities that differentiate them from followers, discovering these qualities should be possible hodgetts, 1993, p. Stogdills 1948 survey of 25 years of research, in which he concluded, a person does not become a leader by virtue of the possession of some combination of traits. The trait approach emphasizes the personality of the leader.
They are based on the premise that leaders are born, not made i. In spite of the increased focus of researchers on trait theory, it remains among the more criticized theories of. He suggests that traits considered singly hold little diagnostic or predictive significance. In psychology, trait theory also called dispositional theory is an approach to the study of human personality.
What is the significance of ralf stogdills trait theory. Up until the early 1950s, it was really the only theory of leadership that was considered valid. Many studies have been conducted to investigate the behavioral approach. An individual with leadership traits who was a leader in one situation might not be a leader in another situation. Critiques of the leader trait paradigm jenkins, 1947. The mediating role of contributions to group success. According to this perspective, traits are aspects of personality that are relatively stable over time, differ across individuals. This variety of research settings, together with a lack of theory linking leadership and leadership situations to prescribed leader characteristics, decreased. Trait theory explains leadership in terms of personality and character of the leader. Although stogdill did find some consistent relations, he concluded, the findings suggest that leadership is not a matter of passive status or of the mere possession of some combination of traits stogdill, 1948, p. For seventeen years and through two editions, this handbook has been the indispensable bible for every serious student of leadership. Several academics believe that potential leaders can be spotted by studying the personality traits of the individual and matching them to the characteristics of actual leaders. Foundations of leadership summary chart of leadership perspectivestheoriesmodels v.
Stogdill, 1963, and established the behavior paradigm of. Reviews by stogdill 1948 and mann 1959 expressed skepticism regarding the trait theory of leadership and consequently the theory fell out of favor with many leadership researchers. This target article gives critical consideration to the nature of the evidence supporting such a view as well as to more fundamental issues concerning the conceptual status of the trait concept. Some of the first studies to be done were conducted at the ohio state university in the late 1940s, based on the findings of stogdills 1948 work, which pointed to the importance of considering more than leaders traits in leadership research. Sometimes, obstacles in life present limitations that can only be brought out in certain situations like physical traits to be an effective leader, such as height and weight trait theory of leadership. That development, with its emphasis on the context in which the leader and followers functioned, and the demands it made for various quahties of leadership, was a counterweight to the long dominant leadertrait approach. In 1948 he said that leaders did not have traits that were unique to leaders.
Since the publication of burnss 1978 seminal work on transforming. Stogdill, 1948 prompted scholars to look beyond leader traits and consider how leaders behaviors predicted effectiveness. Effective leadership is one of the key factors in its growth, change and regeneration. A short history of leadership theories by gene early. Early in the 20th century, leaders were said to be powerful, taller, stronger, more intelligence and selfconfident. In his second study, he analyzed another 163 studies completed between 1948. Online shopping from a great selection at books store. Stogdill in his two surveys conducted between 1904 to 1947 and 1948 to 1970 identified certain traits that contribute towards an individual as heading the leadership process. The trait approach to leadership ha tried unsuccessfully to specify characteristics that differentiated effective from ineffective leader behavior. That leadership depends upon having certain traits allows behavior modification to become more tenable in producing good leaders, if one takes to heart the writings of b.
Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. I am grateful to james scouller, an expert coach, thinker, and writer on leadership, for the contribution of most of the technical content on this article, and for the collaboration in editing it and presenting it here. It was reconceptualized as a relationship between people as opposed to a set of traits stogdill, 1948. Traditional leadership theories traits research stogdill 1948, mann. Senior managers, for example, have become an increasing subject of inquiry. Trait theory gives constructive information about leadership that is very complex. Already in 1990, bass 1990a found a proliferation of leadership books over 3, 300. The assumption that effective leaders differ in some identifiable and fundamental ways from other people is still a large part of mainstream io psychology. European journal of work and organizational psychology. In 1948, ralph melvin stogdill did a study that suggested leadership is based off of social situational interaction and not predefined traits cherry, 2016. Trait theories of leadership identify the specific personality traits that distinguish leaders from nonleaders. The personality variables the studies which meet the criteria.
1313 600 521 349 555 780 100 246 370 891 380 957 1411 1511 747 1616 420 461 1625 899 1154 1007 1351 1005 445 21 1105 34 1042 963 1371 1245 983 1396 811 1369 754